|
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
|
Integration and Publications as Indicators of "Yield" From Mixed Methods Studies
Alicia O'Cathain
University of Sheffield, United Kingdom
Elizabeth Murphy
University of Nottingham, United Kingdom
Jon Nicholl
University of Sheffield, United Kingdom
A mixed methods study has the potential to produce knowledge that is unavailable to a qualitative study and a quantitative study undertaken independently. Any unique insight or ``yield'' from a mixed methods study may be difficult to assess in practice. However, given that integration of data or findings from different components of a study is a core characteristic of mixed methods research, two possible indicators of yield can be used: first, the extent to which researchers exploit the potential for integration in mixed methods studies; and second, the way in which this integration is communicated in peer-reviewed journal articles. Here, the authors apply these indicators to mixed methods studies in health services research in the United Kingdom.
Key Words: integration peer-reviewed articles health research
Journal of Mixed Methods Research, Vol. 1, No. 2,
147-163 (2007)
DOI: 10.1177/1558689806299094

CiteULike Complore Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati Twitter What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
P. Bazeley
Editorial: Integrating Data Analyses in Mixed Methods Research
Journal of Mixed Methods Research,
July 1, 2009;
3(3):
203 - 207.
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. W. Creswell
Editorial: Mapping the Field of Mixed Methods Research
Journal of Mixed Methods Research,
April 1, 2009;
3(2):
95 - 108.
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
G. M. Ames, M. R. Duke, R. S. Moore, and C. B. Cunradi
The Impact of Occupational Culture on Drinking Behavior of Young Adults in the U.S. Navy
Journal of Mixed Methods Research,
April 1, 2009;
3(2):
129 - 150.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
V. Slonim-Nevo and I. Nevo
Conflicting Findings in Mixed Methods Research: An Illustration From an Israeli Study on Immigration
Journal of Mixed Methods Research,
April 1, 2009;
3(2):
109 - 128.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
L. C. Hart, S. Z. Smith, S. L. Swars, and M. E. Smith
An Examination of Research Methods in Mathematics Education (1995-2005)
Journal of Mixed Methods Research,
January 1, 2009;
3(1):
26 - 41.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. M. Woolley
Meeting the Mixed Methods Challenge of Integration in a Sociological Study of Structure and Agency
Journal of Mixed Methods Research,
January 1, 2009;
3(1):
7 - 25.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. O'Cathain, E. Murphy, and J. Nicholl
Multidisciplinary, Interdisciplinary, or Dysfunctional? Team Working in Mixed-Methods Research
Qual Health Res,
November 1, 2008;
18(11):
1574 - 1585.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
V. L. Plano Clark, C. A. Huddleston-Casas, S. L. Churchill, D. O'Neil Green, and A. L. Garrett
Mixed Methods Approaches in Family Science Research
Journal of Family Issues,
November 1, 2008;
29(11):
1543 - 1566.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. W. Creswell and A. Tashakkori
Editorial: How Do Research Manuscripts Contribute to the Literature on Mixed Methods?
Journal of Mixed Methods Research,
April 1, 2008;
2(2):
115 - 120.
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. R. Sosulski and C. Lawrence
Mixing Methods for Full-Strength Results: Two Welfare Studies
Journal of Mixed Methods Research,
April 1, 2008;
2(2):
121 - 148.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. O'Cathain, E. Murphy, and J. Nicholl
The quality of mixed methods studies in health services research
J Health Serv Res Policy,
April 1, 2008;
13(2):
92 - 98.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
K. Wilkins and R. Woodgate
Designing a Mixed Methods Study in Pediatric Oncology Nursing Research
Journal of Pediatric Oncology Nursing,
February 1, 2008;
25(1):
24 - 33.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
|
|