Journal of Mixed Methods Research

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click Here for More Information

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by O'Cathain, A.
Right arrow Articles by Nicholl, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Journal of Mixed Methods Research, Vol. 1, No. 2, 147-163 (2007)
DOI: 10.1177/1558689806299094

Integration and Publications as Indicators of "Yield" From Mixed Methods Studies

Alicia O'Cathain

University of Sheffield, United Kingdom

Elizabeth Murphy

University of Nottingham, United Kingdom

Jon Nicholl

University of Sheffield, United Kingdom

A mixed methods study has the potential to produce knowledge that is unavailable to a qualitative study and a quantitative study undertaken independently. Any unique insight or ``yield'' from a mixed methods study may be difficult to assess in practice. However, given that integration of data or findings from different components of a study is a core characteristic of mixed methods research, two possible indicators of yield can be used: first, the extent to which researchers exploit the potential for integration in mixed methods studies; and second, the way in which this integration is communicated in peer-reviewed journal articles. Here, the authors apply these indicators to mixed methods studies in health services research in the United Kingdom.

Key Words: integration • peer-reviewed articles • health research


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Journal of Mixed Methods ResearchHome page
J. W. Creswell and A. Tashakkori
Editorial: How Do Research Manuscripts Contribute to the Literature on Mixed Methods?
Journal of Mixed Methods Research, April 1, 2008; 2(2): 115 - 120.
[PDF]


Home page
Journal of Mixed Methods ResearchHome page
M. R. Sosulski and C. Lawrence
Mixing Methods for Full-Strength Results: Two Welfare Studies
Journal of Mixed Methods Research, April 1, 2008; 2(2): 121 - 148.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
J Health Serv Res PolicyHome page
A. O'Cathain, E. Murphy, and J. Nicholl
The quality of mixed methods studies in health services research
J Health Serv Res Policy, April 1, 2008; 13(2): 92 - 98.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Pediatric Oncology NursingHome page
K. Wilkins and R. Woodgate
Designing a Mixed Methods Study in Pediatric Oncology Nursing Research
Journal of Pediatric Oncology Nursing, February 1, 2008; 25(1): 24 - 33.
[Abstract] [PDF]