This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Morgan, D. L. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                   What's this?

Paradigms Lost and Pragmatism Regained

Methodological Implications of Combining Qualitative and Quantitative Methods

Portland State University, Oregon

This article examines several methodological issues associated with combining qualitative and quantitative methods by comparing the increasing interest in this topic with the earlier renewal of interest in qualitative research during the 1980s. The first section argues for the value of Kuhn’s concept of paradigm shifts as a tool for examining changes in research fields such as social science research methodology. The next two sections consider the initial rise of the "metaphysical paradigm" that justified the renewed interest in qualitative research and the subsequent problems that have encouraged efforts to replace that paradigm. The final section of the paper advocates a "pragmatic approach" as a new guiding paradigm in social science research methods, both as a basis for supporting work that combines qualitative and quantitative methods and as a way to redirect our attention to methodological rather than metaphysical concerns.

Key Words: paradigms • pragmatism • research methodology

Journal of Mixed Methods Research, Vol. 1, No. 1, 48-76 (2007)
DOI: 10.1177/2345678906292462


CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				P. J. Scott and J. S. Briggs A Pragmatist Argument for Mixed Methodology in Medical Informatics Journal of Mixed Methods Research, July 1, 2009; 3(3): 223 - 241. [Abstract] [PDF]

				P. Clarke Understanding the Experience of Stroke: A Mixed-Method Research Agenda Gerontologist, June 1, 2009; 49(3): 293 - 302. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. W. Creswell Editorial: Mapping the Field of Mixed Methods Research Journal of Mixed Methods Research, April 1, 2009; 3(2): 95 - 108. [PDF]

				V. Slonim-Nevo and I. Nevo Conflicting Findings in Mixed Methods Research: An Illustration From an Israeli Study on Immigration Journal of Mixed Methods Research, April 1, 2009; 3(2): 109 - 128. [Abstract] [PDF]

				S. Arnon and N. Reichel Closed and Open-Ended Question Tools in a Telephone Survey About ``The Good Teacher'': An Example of a Mixed Method Study Journal of Mixed Methods Research, April 1, 2009; 3(2): 172 - 196. [Abstract] [PDF]

				K. Wells and J. H. Littell Study Quality Assessment in Systematic Reviews of Research on Intervention Effects Research on Social Work Practice, January 1, 2009; 19(1): 52 - 62. [Abstract] [PDF]

				L. Rauscher and B. H Greenfield Advancements in Contemporary Physical Therapy Research: Use of Mixed Methods Designs Physical Therapy, January 1, 2009; 89(1): 91 - 100. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. Tashakkori and J. W. Creswell Editorial: Envisioning the Future Stewards of the Social-Behavioral Research Enterprise Journal of Mixed Methods Research, October 1, 2008; 2(4): 291 - 295. [PDF]

				D. J. Kennett, F. T. O'Hagan, and D. Cezer Learned Resourcefulness and the Long-Term Benefits of a Chronic Pain Management Program Journal of Mixed Methods Research, October 1, 2008; 2(4): 317 - 339. [Abstract] [PDF]

				S. Hodgkin Telling It All: A Story of Women's Social Capital Using a Mixed Methods Approach Journal of Mixed Methods Research, October 1, 2008; 2(4): 296 - 316. [Abstract] [PDF]

				C. Day, P. Sammons, and Q. Gu Combining Qualitative and Quantitative Methodologies in Research on Teachers' Lives, Work, and Effectiveness: From Integration to Synergy Educational Researcher, August 1, 2008; 37(6): 330 - 342. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. Denscombe Communities of Practice: A Research Paradigm for the Mixed Methods Approach Journal of Mixed Methods Research, July 1, 2008; 2(3): 270 - 283. [Abstract] [PDF]

				M. R. Sosulski and C. Lawrence Mixing Methods for Full-Strength Results: Two Welfare Studies Journal of Mixed Methods Research, April 1, 2008; 2(2): 121 - 148. [Abstract] [PDF]

				S. Mendlinger and J. Cwikel Spiraling Between Qualitative and Quantitative Data on Women's Health Behaviors: A Double Helix Model for Mixed Methods Qual Health Res, February 1, 2008; 18(2): 280 - 293. [Abstract] [PDF]

				K. M. Yount and J. Gittelsohn Comparing Reports of Health-Seeking Behavior From the Integrated Illness History and a Standard Child Morbidity Survey Journal of Mixed Methods Research, January 1, 2008; 2(1): 23 - 62. [Abstract] [PDF]

				R. Wall, P. Devine-Wright, and G. A. Mill Interactions Between Perceived Behavioral Control and Personal-Normative Motives: Qualitative and Quantitative Evidence From a Study of Commuting-Mode Choice Journal of Mixed Methods Research, January 1, 2008; 2(1): 63 - 86. [Abstract] [PDF]

				J. W. Creswell and A. Tashakkori Editorial: Differing Perspectives on Mixed Methods Research Journal of Mixed Methods Research, October 1, 2007; 1(4): 303 - 308. [PDF]

				J. W. Creswell and A. Tashakkori Editorial: Developing Publishable Mixed Methods Manuscripts Journal of Mixed Methods Research, April 1, 2007; 1(2): 107 - 111. [PDF]